|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 12-14
An unusual cause of osteomalacia – A case report of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of the right hip bone
Bingcheng Wu1, Joel-Louis Zongwei Lim2, Fredrik Petersson1
1 Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Singapore
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Singapore
|Date of Web Publication||7-Feb-2019|
Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT), while a rare entity, is nevertheless an important cause of oncogenic malacia/tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO). We present a case of PMT. Our 47-year-old patient presented with unexplained osteomalacia refractory to medical therapy, associated with left subtrochanteric stress fracture. Further workup revealed the presence of a tumor in the left anterior inferior iliac spine, which was subsequently excised. Histopathology of the tumor showed the characteristic features of PMT, including grungy calcifications, osteoclast-type multinucleated giant cells, and bland round-to-spindled tumor cells. Following excision of the PMT, the patient's osteomalacia swiftly resolved. PMT is an important differential diagnosis in the context of oncogenic osteomalacia/TIO. As highlighted by our case report, PMT has fairly characteristic clinical and histopathologic features. However, given its rarity, an awareness of this entity is required for correct diagnosis and treatment.
Keywords: Fibroblast growth factor-23, oncogenic osteomalacia, phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor, tumor-induced osteomalacia
|How to cite this article:|
Wu B, Lim JLZ, Petersson F. An unusual cause of osteomalacia – A case report of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of the right hip bone. Int J Clinicopathol Correl 2018;2:12-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Wu B, Lim JLZ, Petersson F. An unusual cause of osteomalacia – A case report of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of the right hip bone. Int J Clinicopathol Correl [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Jul 16];2:12-4. Available from: http://www.ijcpc.org/text.asp?2018/2/1/12/251906
| Introduction|| |
Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT), while a rare entity, is nevertheless an important cause of oncogenic malacia/tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO). This case report highlights the salient clinical and histopathological features of PMT.
| Case Report|| |
Our patient was a 47-year-old male who presented with a 5-month history of left groin pain. Plain radiographs of the pelvis and left hip joint revealed an incomplete left subtrochanteric stress fracture. The patient's symptoms were attributed to his left subtrochanteric stress fracture. He was advised to ambulate with crutches and to only partial weight bear on his left lower limb for 2 months.
After 2 months of protected weight bearing, the patient's symptoms persisted. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the left hip and femur revealed that the subtrochanteric stress fracture had not healed. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry revealed a bone mineral density of the right hip of −1.9 standard deviations, which was indicative of osteopenia. The patient had a low serum phosphate level of 0.41 mmol/L (reference range: 0.85–1.45 mmol/L), adjusted serum calcium of 2.17 mmol/L (reference range: 2.15–2.55 mmol/L), serum parathyroid hormone level of 4.8 pmol/L (reference range: 1.3–9.3 pmol/L), and a low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of 23.3 μg/L (reference range: 30–100 μg/L). The patient had a borderline high fractional excretion of phosphate of 25% (reference range: 5%–25%), low tubular reabsorption of phosphate of 75% (reference range: 80%–95%), and a renal threshold phosphate concentration or ratio of maximum tubular reabsorption of phosphate to glomerular filtration rate (TmPO4/GFR) of 0.35 mmol/L (reference range: 0.8–1.35 mmol/L). The hypophosphatemia persisted in spite of oral phosphate replacement. Further testing revealed a mildly elevated serum level of fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) of 182 RU/mL (reference range: ≤180 RU/mL).
Based on these findings, a diagnosis of osteomalacia was rendered. In view of the persistent hypophosphatemia refractory to oral replacement therapy, accompanying phosphaturia, and mildly elevated FGF-23 level, there was a clinical suspicion of TIO. Positron emission tomography-CT of the whole body was performed to look for a possible neoplasm. This revealed focal uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose at a lytic focus in the right anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS). A follow-up magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis showed a well-defined, subcortical lesion with a thin sclerotic border, measuring approximately 1.2 cm × 1.2 cm × 1.2 cm. This lesion was hyperintense on T2-weighted images with moderately avid postcontrast enhancement. No surrounding marrow edema was noted and the cortex overlying this lesion was intact.
An excision biopsy of the right AIIS lesion was subsequently performed. One-day postexcision, the serum FGF-23 level had fallen to <50 RU/ml. One-week postexcision, the serum phosphate level had recovered to 0.94 mmol/L. One-month postexcision, the serum phosphate level had further increased to 1.50 mmol/L and the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level had recovered to 29.1 μg/L. Six months after surgery, our patient was asymptomatic with no complaints of pain in his left lower limb. X-rays revealed that his left subtrochanteric fracture had healed and new bone had formed across the defect created by the excision of the lesion. The patient's serum phosphate was within normal limits at 1.39 mmol/L and the serum 24-hydroxyvitamin D level was also within normal limits at 28 ug/L.
Macroscopically, the tumor was completely intraosseous with intact cortex [Figure 1]. The tumor's histopathological features are demonstrated in [Figure 2]. The tumor was lobulated with slightly irregular borders and displayed a myxoid, glistening cut surface with minute foci of gritty calcifications. Microscopically, the tumor demonstrated a nondestructive pattern of bone invasion featuring neoplastic tissue surrounding bony trabeculae in a “permeating fashion.” The neoplastic spindle cells showed bland nuclear features. Osteoclast-type multinucleated cells were focally present. Mitotic activity was minimal (<1/10 HPFs) and there was no necrosis. The tumor demonstrated highly variable cellularity; in more cellular areas, the tumor cells were spindled in morphology and densely packed together with little intervening collagenous stroma, while in less cellular areas, the tumor cells were stellate to ovoid in morphology, with intervening collagenous stroma, interspersed with areas of prominent myxoid change, imparting a pseudocystic appearance. Within the tumor, there were scattered, dilated, small-to-medium-sized blood vessels, but a typical staghorn or hemangiopericytomatous appearance was not evident. There were several small foci of grungy calcifications within the stroma scattered throughout the tumor. The histopathological features of the tumor were fully consistent with a PMT. Chromogen in situ hybridization showed the tumor cells to be positive for FGF-23. No further immunohistochemistry was performed on the tumor.
|Figure 1: The intraosseous tumor shows bone invasion and a lobulated, myxoid cut surface|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: (a) The tumor shows a nondestructive bone invasion, with areas of variable cellularity. In the less cellular areas, there is extensive pseudocystic change (H and E, ×20). (b) Densely cellular areas alternate with less cellular areas. Irregularly shaped pseudocysts are present within the less cellular areas. Foci of grungy calcifications are seen. Tumor cells are oval to spindled, with minimal cytological atypia (H and E, ×100). (c) Cellular areas of the tumor show spindled tumor cells with elongated nuclei. Nucleoli, when visible, are small and not prominent. In these areas, the tumor cells are vaguely arranged in loose fascicles (H and E, ×200 magnification). (d) Hypocellular areas of the tumor show stellate to oval tumor cells within a loose, myxoid, cystic background (H and E, ×200)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
PMT is an uncommon mesenchymal neoplasm and is the most common cause of the paraneoplastic syndrome of TIO/oncogenic osteomalacia. The most common site of occurrence of PMT is soft tissue, but a range of other sites, including the bone and sinonasal tract, skin, meninges, thyroid, and mediastinum are on record.,,,,,
Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice, and this leads to the resolution of TIO. Local recurrences following incomplete tumor excision may occur.
If a biopsy specimen from a PMT predominantly/only contains areas of bland spindle cells, one would have to contemplate a few differential diagnostic possibilities such as solitary fibrous tumor, myofibroma, and a low-grade fibroblastic osteosarcoma. The presence of grungy calcified matrix in this case is highly characteristic, albeit not pathognomonic of PMT. Further confirmation of the diagnosis of PMT in this case is provided by FGF-23 CISH positivity.
Although PMTs display a set of histopathological features (in varying proportions) that are highly characteristic, ancillary tests are helpful and the most useful one is CISH for FGF-23. SSTR2A immunohistochemistry is a new ancillary test that may prove useful in the diagnosis of PMT., A novel FN1-FGFR1 gene rearrangement has also been described in a proportion of PMT, but further studies are needed to better assess the diagnostic relevance of this and also in more detail characterize the genetic signature of this tumor.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Andrew Folpe and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, for performing the FGF-23 immunohistochemistry and providing us with a representative image.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Gardner KH, Shon W, Folpe AL, Wieland CN, Tebben PJ, Baum CL, et al.
Tumor-induced osteomalacia resulting from primary cutaneous phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor: A case and review of the medical literature. J Cutan Pathol 2013;40:780-4.
Shelekhova KV, Kazakov DV, Michal M. Sinonasal phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (mixed connective tissue variant): Report of 2 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:596-7.
Tsujimura T, Sakaguchi K, Aozasa K. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor, mixed connective tissue variant (oncogenic osteomalacia). Pathol Int 1996;46:238-41.
Harvey JN, Gray C, Belchetz PE. Oncogenous osteomalacia and malignancy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1992;37:379-82.
Peterson NR, Summerlin DJ, Cordes SR. Multiple phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors associated with oncogenic osteomalacia: Case report and review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J 2010;89:E11-5.
Mathis DA, Stehel EJ Jr., Beshay JE, Mickey BE, Folpe AL, Raisanen J, et al.
Intracranial phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors: Report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg 2013;118:903-7.
Mok Y, Lee JC, Lum JH, Petersson F. From epistaxis to bone pain-report of two cases illustrating the clinicopathological spectrum of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour with fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 immunohistochemical and cytogenetic analyses. Histopathology 2016;68:925-30.
Clugston E, Gill AC, Graf N, Bonar F, Gill AJ. Use of immunohistochemistry for SSTR2A to support a diagnosis of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour. Pathology 2015;47:173-5.
Houang M, Clarkson A, Sioson L, Elston MS, Clifton-Bligh RJ, Dray M, et al.
Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors show positive staining for somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A). Hum Pathol 2013;44:2711-8.
Lee JC, Jeng YM, Su SY, Wu CT, Tsai KS, Lee CH, et al.
Identification of a novel FN1-FGFR1 genetic fusion as a frequent event in phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour. J Pathol 2015;235:539-45.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]